VOIVOD
"VOIVOD"
Year
of Release: 2003
Label:Surfdog
Reviewer:
Shortstick
Date: 3/5/03
Ammended: 10/17/03
Rating:
2/5
|
|
"I
think that I'm in a band now that can kick their (Metallica's) ass."
said Jason Newsted in a December interview with MTV. Not being familiar
with Voivod's older music, I was kind of geeked when I saw Jason's
comments. Metallica hasn't been kicking too much ass lately, but
their albums have still been decent to listen to, so I figured if
Voivod's new effort sounded slightly better than Re-load, it might
be a decent album.

This
pic amused me, so I had to include it! |
My first
taste of the album came from the 3 songs posted at MP3.com ("We
Carry On", "Rebel Robot", and "Gasmask Revival").
It was a taste that I wasn't too fond of to be quite honest. The
singer, "Snake", has an uninspiring voice that reminds
me of Bruce Dickinson when he's hitting the low notes. Snake however,
lacks the range of Bruce and frankly, that's not a good thing. The
guitar work and music in general doesn't sound too bad, but it's
not very dynamic either and tends to get boring after a while.

| This
Snake dude seriously freaks me out |
The sound
quality of this album itself sounds like it was recorded in some
dudes basement and they forgot to adjust the levels when they went
to mix the album. Sometimes this can be refreshing, especially in
an era of over-produced albums, but there were times that it sounded
like poor Snake's voice was being drowned out. (then again, that
really might not be a bad thing.) I thought with the musical background
that Jason Newsted possesses that he would at least want to put
an album that sounded good if even the music itself doesn't.

Nice
ouftit Snake. You're still freaking me out! |
Voivod
sounds like a mid-1980's metal band that never evolved or grew up
in terms of music. While other bands from that period (Sepultura,
Metallica, Megadeth to name a few), experimented and tried to upgrade
their sound (even if it ended up sounding worse in the long run),
many bands such as Voivod decided to stay the course and keep making
the same album over and over again (take notes Slayer and Pantera).
With that being said, I can see how fans from this period of metal
will like this album and probably call me an idiot for liking nu-metal
bands, but not this album. For this reason, I gave it a 2 rating
instead of the 1 that I was going to give it. This album is going
to make a certain group of people very happy. It doesn't make it
a good album though.
GIGGLES'
THOUGHTS: I agree completely with Shortstick.
Just because a band has history doesn't mean it can
always live to an old age. These bands are like stagnant
water--- once they were beautiful, new, fresh runoff
from crystaline rain, but they never wanted to make
a ripple, never wanted to change a thing. What pisses
people off about Metallica is the disturbance they create
in their music; they throw mud into the water and change
its original color, but they keep the water moving.
However, like Shortstick said, there are people who
enjoy stagnant water because everything they wanted
and needed is trapped under that hideous green layer." |
|
SHORTSTICK’S
LAST WORD: I had honestly never heard of Voivod until Jason
Newsted joined them. I guess my era of metal (starting in early
90s, after the hair band phenomenon had ended) sort of skipped past
this band. They sort of seem to be from a generation of metal that
happened a few years before my time. It wasn’t really my intention
to thrash this album when I first heard it, because I wish no ill
will towards Jason, but I guess I was kind of letdown (my gripes
are already well documented).
|